August 4, 2020

Dear Friends in the Pro Life Movement

I would like to introduce you to Dennis and Peggy Cuddy of No. Carolina. This is a mother and son team devoted to writing and informing people about the dangers of government control of the family.

In 1997 Peggy had published a booklet entitled: The Graspers: Is your Family Safe from them?

Peggy, had begun reporting on the, then strange, educational programs being developed and promoted by professors at The U. of No. Carolina at Chapel Hill where she had once worked. The program entitled the Abecedarian project is now touted throughout academia as the Social Emotional Learning agenda the focus of which is transferring the ultimate control of the child from the family to the state.

Dennis, aside from being a Professor, has authored about 20 books and dozens of articles. I invite you to visit the site NewsWithviews where you will find all his archived reports. There you will learn much about the characters and philosophies of many of the elitists who down through the decades have striven to be the powers behind the thrones of government leading us to the condition of the world as we know it today. . violence, terrorism, pandemics, attacks on our Constitutional rights, to name but a few.

All of his works are archived in the website. Below is a small example of his writing, extracted from a November 30, 2015 report entitled HOW TO DESTROY AMERICA. (I have permission from Dennis to publish).

Here is a brief paragraph of the above mentioned article:

Unfortunately, the United States has forsaken the Biblical values of the American Revolution and has adopted the values of the French Revolution instead.

In the early 1900s, Communist theoretician Antonio Gramsci wrote SOCIALISMO E FASCISMO: L’ORDINE NUOVO (SOCIALISM AND FASCISM: THE NEW ORDER) proposing to defeat the West by capturing the culture via infiltration of schools, universities, churches, the media, etc. After the Communist Revolution in Russia in 1917, John Dewey (”Father of Progressive Education”) went to the Soviet Union, and in THE NEW REPUBLIC (December 5, 1928) expressed his admiration of the Bolsheviks, who were undermining the church and the family. In 1932, the National Education Association made Dewey their honorary president, and the next year he co-authored the atheistic HUMANIST MANIFESTO.

The financial situation of the Cuddy family has been drastically depleted due to unwillingness to move Peggy into Government care but in order to continue to provide her proper care we hope that you or your organization consider lifting-up the family in prayer for the spiritual strength and financial assistance now necessary for Peggy’s return to stable health and assistance in meeting the healthcare bills quickly mounting.

Here is Dennis’ plea for financial assistance for his mother’s continuing care:

Peggy Cuddy has been a strong prolife advocates for decades, publishing articles and attending marches, but recently she has suffered horribly. A doctor gave her the wrong medicine resulting in an acute brain disease, which has cost us $160,000 out-of-pocket so far and has taken almost all my life savings. Medicine given for back pain wiped out her immune system, causing a relatively minor face cancer to quickly triple in size! Seeking relief from dehydration and aspiration, she was informed by an ER doctor all she could do was “go home and suffer.” Two weeks ago she was admitted to a hospital with a slight fever, given nothing to eat for 3 days, was then placed in Intensive care and developed Mersa. After several attempts to have her tested for COVID, she was finally tested positive, placed in critical care, and is now fighting for her life on a ventilator and dialysis machine. Please pray for her and help us financially to pay her bills.

Peggy’s son, Dennis Cuddy (our address is 1027 St. Mary’s St., Raleigh, NC 27605).

Please give some thought to assisting this family. Please, also, share this request with others whom you think might be able to provide help to two long time loyal members of the Right to Life community.

Sincerely,
Camille Giglio. Director
California Right to Life Committee

Share on Facebook

Posted by Camille to on August 10th, 2020 |

Share on Facebook

Posted by Camille to , on January 4th, 2021 | add a comment

CALIFORNIA RIGHT TO LIFE COMMITTEE, INC.
2872 Ygnacio Valley Rd. #243
Walnut Creek, Ca  94598
(925) 899-3064
callifeadvocates.org/blog

7/20/21. Walnut Creek, Ca.

There is no one at the state legislature but amending and voting on legislation continues, apparently, from home.

The 3 last bills listed here are going to be heard on 7/27 on the Senate floor. Here are four bills of some importance:

• AB767, lead author, Asm Tim Grayson, (D-Concord). Victim Compensation.
  Recommendation: Strongly Oppose.
  Hearing:  7/27 Senate Public Safety Comm.  916-651-4118

  Situation:  The bill has gone through 6 amendings and four hearings receiving a strong majority support before it was gutted and amended and on its last hearing. It now carries a radical new interpretation of the State Victim Compensation Fund and its purpose which appears to be a new way for the taxpayer to become the victim of misapplied social justice.

  Summary:  Revises the definition of crime to include an incident in which an individual sustains injury or death as a result of an encounter with a peace officer, regardless of whether the peace officer is arrested for, charged with, or convicted of committing a crime. Prohibits the Victim Compensation Board from denying an application, in whole or in part, based upon a deceased victim’ s involvement in the events leading to the qualifying crime if the victim’ s death occurred as a result of the crime. )This includes someone referred to as a “Derivative Victim” meaning someone) adult, child, prenatal child) experiencing a financial loss because of the victimization, not necessarily death, of a parent, sibling, domestic partner, etc.

  This bill is a stealth attack on police, as well as a free pass for anyone, BLM, LGBTQ, illegals, without accountability, to receive payment from the state, etc. and turns a basically good intentioned program into a fundraising tool for errant citizens.

  Originally Asm. Tim Grayson was merely a listed co-author and Buffy Wicks (both Contra Costa assembly members) was lead author. Now it’s reversed with Grayson as lead author.

  This man was, when he was elected to the Concord city council, a Minister, Republican, pro life and Chaplain to the Sheriffs dept.

  When he got to the state office he became a Democrat,  pro Planned Parenthood and involved with the very progressive element within the state Assembly.

   

• AB77, Education Omnibus Budget Trailer Bill.  Third Reading on Senate Floor. 7/27 CALL YOUR OWN SENATOR TO OPPOSE.

  The bill was introduced in late 2018 and has gone through 20 amendings.

  1. Seeks to obtain approximately $800,000,000 total between Federal Trust Funds and State General Fund.
      
  2. To restructure certain areas of education dealing with child care, workforce training for childcare duty, new purchases or re-modeling of old buildings to be used for child care from birth to age 5 years.
      
  3. Drastic changes removing authorizations from the state in requirements regarding partnerships or contracts between local Superintendents of Education with outside groups on subject of re-organizing school districts.
      
  4. It is 236 pages long but with only 4 public hearings and vote sessions.

   

• AB6, Eloise Gomez Reyes, Early Childhood Education: Coordination and Quality.  This bill has been sitting in a committee for almost one and a half years. Its had a combined 10 committee hearings between both houses and has been in the inactive file until now when nobody is looking.

  Major supporters: 

  ACLU California, Ca. State PTA, First 5 California, American Academy of Pediatrics, Early Edge California, Alliance for Children’s Rights, Junior League. Nine out of 15 money hungry NGOs’

  It establishes these mandates:

  1. Partnering between the Children and Families Commission and stakeholders from early learning and care NGOs’
      
  2. Coordinate with state Dept of Health Care Services, Public Health and the Ca. Children and Families Commission.
      
  3. Universal preschool providing holistic (Whole Child) care.
      
  4. Interagency workgroups, coordinating with early Childhood Policy Council with representation in the interagency groupings.
      
  5. Increase the alignment of curricula and professional development for the California Infant/Toddler Curriculum Framework making it all work within the Federal title V Maternal and Child Health Services Block Grand program.
      
  6. Support the social and emotional development of all children in early learning and care settings.
      
  7. And the final nail in the coffin; The quality improvement workgroup shall consider input from parents. Here is, I imagine, the money going from the findings in AB 77.

   

• AB1030, Ian Calderon, Pelvic Examinations, informational Pamphlet. This will be part of the health care to which your child will be subjected during school hours and without your knowledge.

  The bill has been in the inactive file for almost one year.  Though it only talks about the development of pelvic exam pamphlets, distribution of said pamphlets is implied and authorization to perform those exams may well be focused on the children in the new role of school as health care clinic.

  Requires contact with your state Senator.  If you do not know your Senator or his/her phone number go to:

  www.leginfo.legislature.ca.gov. You are able to pull up the bill itself and read it as well as find your state Elected Officials

  Share on Facebook

  Posted by Camille to on July 20th, 2020 | add a comment

The New Bioethics

Profound respect for the sanctity oflife has always been the core ethical principle of medicine, but that is changing. Today, sadly, the truth that every human life has equal worth is rejected by utilitarian-minded bioethicists. The new bioethics divides human beings into two categories: the “wanted” and the “unwanted.” Like their brothers and sisters who are aborted at the beginning of their lives, the chronically or terminally ill, disabled, and elderly are in danger of being killed simply because it is inconvenient and/or costly to care for them.

Palliative medications designed to relieve suffering are being misapplied in the hospice care setting as a tool in this new bioethics to make “unwanted” people die.

When hospice care is provided by healthcare professionals who truly respect life, it is a blessing. However, in practice, hospice is often not as advertised.

Stealth Euthanasia

Hospice care, whether provided in a patient’s home or a facility, is the “ideal” setting for the misuse of palliative medicines to secretly eliminate the “unwanted.”

“Stealth euthanasia” means the intentional hastening of a patient’s death while pretending to provide appropriate treatment. A typical report that we receive from grieving family members is that their loved one, who had been alert and was not complaining of pain, was administered increasingly frequent and larger doses of pain medications and sedatives to the point where they were sleeping all the time and could not eat or drink. Some reported that patients were also denied their usual medications to control blood pressure, diabetes, etc.

In September of 2000, the World Federation of Right to Die Societies (an association of organizations which promote euthanasia) issued an ominous declaration, stating in part:

We wish to draw public attention to the practice of “terminal sedation” or “slow euthanasia” which is performed extensively today… A physician may lawfully administer increasing dosages of regular analgesic and sedating drugs that can hasten someone’s death as long as the declared intention is to ease pain and suffering… Compassionate physicians, without publicly declaring the true intention of their actions, often speed up the dying process in this way.

Stay alert!

Doctors (and nurses) who intentionally kill selected patients represent an earth-shattering shift in medical ethics. Thankfully, there are still many members of the medical profession who embrace the sanctity of life ethic. The difficulty lies in discerning who can be trusted never to kill. When a loved one is referred to hospice or palliative care, be wary and stay alert!
 

VOICES UNITED RESISTING THE CULTURE
OF DEATH IN HEALTHCARE

Share on Facebook

Posted by Camille to on April 1st, 2020 | add a comment

As of January 2020, Planned Parenthood has 50 affiliates across the United States. Each affiliate is a separate 501(c)(3) non-profit organization. Each affiliate reports its income to the federal government on a Federal Form 990. Listed below is the annual income of each affiliate based on that data. (NOTE: Five affiliates in New York State merged into a single organization in January. The dollar figure given for Planned Parenthood of Greater New York is an estimate based on the separate incomes of the five affiliates).

These 50 affiliates generate a combined income of over $1.5 billion. Planned Parenthood has been aggressively encouraging affiliates to merge for the last several decades. We believe that Planned Parenthood still wants to reduce the number of affiliates down to, at most, 40. As Planned Parenthood closes clinics and combines affiliates, there will be more and more members of Congress who have no Planned Parenthood operations in their district and/or state. As that happens, PP’s loss of Congressional support will help us close down the organization for good.

Share on Facebook

Posted by Camille to on April 1st, 2020 | add a comment

PUBLIC HEALTH FOR THE PEOPLE:
Flattening the Coronavirus Curve
Camille Giglio

March 18, 2020, Walnut Creek, Ca During a recent tv news appearance President Trump, in discussing the statistics of the Coronavirus and medicine’s ability to serve the quickly expanding need for care, made a very brief reference to how they would meet the demand for care and, while doing that also ”flatten the curve.” Since then it would seem that it has become okay for the media to use that phrase also.

This is a phrase familiar to people in the epidemiological field of medicine, i.e. related to epidemics or surges in social unrest.. With all the news continually bombarding us from the media about this virus and its destructive nature, one might say, well, a statistical curve is not at all important.

Wrong.

This Coronavirus statistical curve is very much what this whole new health care field is all about.. The reference in this instance is for medical and statistical events; for politicians, such as Bernie Sanders. And company, it translates into “Health Care for All.” I’ not trying to suggest that this epidemic was planned as an exercise in controlling groups of people, not at all, but it could be an opportunity for certain agendas, such as population control, to be initiated.

I would invite everyone to research this phrase, I have included a small portion of an article here describing it’s meaning, but it is important enough that all should become familiar with this curve and its purpose..

Julie Fischer, professor of global medicine at Georgetown University explained it’s meaning on a recent C-Span program. “It is a way to slow down the new cases of a fast growing contagious illness making it appear (my emphasis) that it can [be] safely and efficiently meet the needs of the community’s residents who contract the illness.

Ms Fischer also said: It does not mean that fewer cases will occur. It just means that those cases will be spread out over a longer period of time allowing hospitals and clinics to meet those needs.

I would add that it makes it diverts blame from bureaucratic entities and gives the appearance of efficiency.

Many media outlets have attempted to critically point fingers at President Trump as though it is all his fault that this illness has caused such a upheaval in our lives. As I recall, in hearing President trump make this reference it was more like: “Ah, yes, flattening the curve.” Quite possibly Trump was attempting to quietly call the citizen’s attention to the fact that some information is being held back from the public.

I first learned about the Curve when I read a small book authored in 2017, by Dr. Michel Accad, a San Francisco Bay Area, UCSF practicing Cardiologist,. (see the About The Author below) His book entitled Moving Mountains: A Socratic Challenge to the Theory and Practice of Population Medicine.

He used the Socratic method of interviewing Geoffrey Rose, the person who is recognized as one of the people highly influential in public health circles, for discovering and or developing the epidemiological curve as a tool to change and rearrange public statistics to fit the desired goal. (That’s my definition.)

The idea is to take data such as one sees in that curve below and change the outcome by the way they change the data gathered or statistics. For instance, in attempting to find all the people to test for Coronavirus they started (so I read), by testing everyone who had a temperature of 98.6 which could include most everyone. They then said, wait, let’s start by testing everyone with a temperature of 101.1. Well, that got rid of a lot of potential virus patients and began to create a slightly flattened curve making it seem like the government or whomever had a handle on what was happening. This is just a example.

The internet is full of info on this subject.

In the book Dr. Accad (Socrates) has a dialogue with Rose about re-arranging the statistics on population to make it appear that the government is well capable of greatly flattening the curve of problems with certain ethnic groups of people.

Basically the curve, or problem is readily solved by preventive medicine. i.e. preventing or reducing births to certain groups, also birth control, education programs, etc. One doesn’t really solve anything, one just reduces the consequences by reducing the population.

Geoffrey Rose’s prevention theory

“Sick individuals and sick populations” is a paper written by Geoffrey Rose in 1985. It was published in the International Journal of Epidemiology and is one of the most influential public health papers ever written.

He describes and compares the ‘high-risk’ and ‘population’ strategies for prevention of disease. I think most readers will be able to access the original paper here, but if you cannot access it, this Wikipedia article gives you the basic idea.

The main idea is that the largest number of cases of ill health happen not in those at high risk, but in those who have just some risk, simply because there are more of them. See below for a more detailed summary.

The distribution of risk in a population often follows a bell curve (see figure), so if you are able to shift the whole curve to the left (lower risk in red), then everybody has a lower risk and you will get a fffewer number of cases.

Diagram of Geoffrey Rose’s theory

The high risk approach

The ‘high-risk’ approach to prevention is where medical professionals identify people with a condition (e.g. high blood pressure) and prescribe medication to prevent it developing into heart disease, or other diseases high blood pressure might be a risk factor for.

The advantages are that people are likely to be motivated to take the medication and the intervention will be tailored to the individual. The disadvantages are that any fixes may be temporary because the cause of high blood pressure is not identified. Also, predicting new cases of disease (known as incidence) is difficult to predict for individual.

California Right to Life Committee, 2872 Ygnacio Valley Rd 243, Walnut Creek, Ca 94598, 925_899-3064.

To learn more about CRLC visit: www.callifeadvocates.org/blog Look for the video on the Ca. Assembly Women’s Reproductive Rights and their plan to attack the Catholic Church and drive them out of medicine, for failure to deliver medicine and surgeries on demand esp. to the LGBTQ cabal.

Share on Facebook

Posted by Camille to on March 24th, 2020 | add a comment